Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1948 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $98.78 vs $254.12
- Up to 59% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-4160 - $0.77 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 5% better in FIFA 23 than Athlon 3000G - 136 vs 129 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
129
94.85294117647058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1632 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
41.17647058823529%
Price, $
$254.12
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
89.94360902255639%
Multi-Core
1975
95.31853281853282%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |