Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2999 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G540 - 170 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
165
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |