Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 5 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 17% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Athlon 3000G - 591 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 48 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.40851829634073%
Multi-Core
1975
14.83066756777052%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |