Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 922 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $69.99 vs $165.86
- Up to 51% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-11600KF - $0.56 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Athlon 200GE - 144 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
124
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
48%
Price, $
$165.86
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |