Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms A6-4400M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2879 days newer than A6-4400M.
Advantages of AMD A6-4400M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 47% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than A6-4400M - 245 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD A6-4400M - 16 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
A6-4400M
Mobile • May 15th, 2012
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD A6-4400M | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| A6 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Trinity | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FS1r2 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Radeon HD 7520G | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
