Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

A6-7400K vs Core Ultra 9 285

The A6-7400K is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

  • Up to 348% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 10 years and 7 months newer
  • Available for $579

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core Ultra 9 285 ranks 65 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 9 285 has 22 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 9 285 has 22 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp
Base Frequencyhelp
AMD A6-7400K Logo
A6-7400K
3.5 GHz

A6-7400K has a 40% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp
AMD A6-7400K Logo
A6-7400K
3.9 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285 boosts 44% higher.

FM2+
Sockethelp
LGA1851
Kaveri
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-S
Desktop
Segmenthelp
Desktop
Radeon R5
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU
1866 MHz (DDR3)
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, A6-7400K or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285. It's 813% faster than the A6-7400K on average across 100+ games, scoring 73/100 vs 8/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285 than A6-7400K?expand_more
813% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, A6-7400K or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285 worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 73/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between A6-7400K and Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more
Performance: A6-7400K scores 8/100, Core Ultra 9 285 scores 73/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the A6-7400K or Core Ultra 9 285 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the A6-7400K or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger pick at 73/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games