Skip to main content
CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

A10-4600M vs Core Ultra 7 265F

The A10-4600M is much slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

  • Up to 403% faster on average across 100+ games
  • Is 12 years and 10 months newer
  • Available for $316.00

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core Ultra 7 265F ranks 63 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 7 265F has 16 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 7 265F has 16 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp
Base Frequencyhelp
AMD A10-4600M Logo
A10-4600M
2.3 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F has a 4% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp
AMD A10-4600M Logo
A10-4600M
3.2 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F boosts 66% higher.

TDPhelp

A10-4600M draws 30W less power.

FS1r2
Sockethelp
LGA1851
Trinity
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-S
Mobile
Segmenthelp
Desktop
Radeon HD 7660G
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics
1600 MHz (DDR3)
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)
Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, A10-4600M or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265F. It's 900% faster than the A10-4600M on average across 100+ games, scoring 70/100 vs 7/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265F than A10-4600M?expand_more
900% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, A10-4600M or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265F is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265F worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 70/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between A10-4600M and Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more
Performance: A10-4600M scores 7/100, Core Ultra 7 265F scores 70/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the A10-4600M or Core Ultra 7 265F bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the A10-4600M or Core Ultra 7 265F?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265F is the stronger pick at 70/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Popular Comparisons

Why Is My PC Slow?

Join thousands of gamers already benchmarking their rigs.

Download HowManyFPS

Windows 10/11, under 50 MB, always free

Spot BottlenecksBoost FPS100+ Games