Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ViprTech Reaper 3.0 Liquid-Cooled outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ViprTech Reaper 3.0 Liquid-Cooled PC
- Performs up to 300% better in Starfield than MXZ - 60 vs 15 FPS
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than MXZ - $25.83 vs $53.27 per FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than ViprTech Reaper 3.0 Liquid-Cooled - $799.0 vs $1549.99
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549.99
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6373 minutes ago
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
43.08080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
35.894660894660895%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
65.55711282410653%
Multi-Core
7692
51.944894651539705%
ViprTech Reaper 3.0 Liquid-Cooled PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
