Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $1174.99 vs $7999.99
- Up to 74% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $9.55 vs $36.20 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 80% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled - 221 vs 123 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
123
56%
Value, $/FPS
$9.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1174.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$36.20/FPS
26%
Price, $
$7999.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
27%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ViprTech Reaper 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7700 | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |