Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 2.0 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost 2.0 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC
- Up to 89% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $824.99 vs $7849.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $8.33 vs $36.68 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 116% better in No Man's Sky than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - 214 vs 99 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $824.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$36.68/FPS
23%
Price, $
$7849.99
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600G | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 6 TB HDD |
