Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — STGAubron outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 64% better in Counter-Strike 2 than MXZ - 373 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than MXZ - $3.22 vs $3.39 per FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 36% cheaper than STGAubron - $769.0 vs $1199.99
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
18th Variation
FPS
373
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1199.99
64%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
18th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
18th Variation
Radeon RX 6800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
648 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
80.64 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
201.6 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
18th Variation
Core i7-11700KF
3.6 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2257
100%
Multi-Core
10185
100%
CPU Winner
STGAubron Gaming Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-11700KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |