Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ABS Cyclone Aqua outperforms the more expensive SGSPARK Poseidon White on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC
- Performs up to 50% better in Monster Hunter: World than SGSPARK Poseidon White - 168 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than SGSPARK Poseidon White - $1119.99 vs $1129.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than SGSPARK Poseidon White - $6.67 vs $10.09 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $1,129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1119.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,119.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 315 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
2nd Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
90%
Multi-Core
9729
86%
6th Variation
Core i5-14400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2350
100%
Multi-Core
11359
100%
CPU Winner
SGSPARK Poseidon White Gaming PC | vs | ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i5-14400F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
