Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 73% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $899.0 vs $3299.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $2.46 vs $6.64 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 36% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than MXZ - 497 vs 365 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15682 minutes ago
FPS
497
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.64/FPS
37%
Price, $
$3299.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15679 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
MXZ Gaming PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 10 TB HDD |
