Key Differences
In short — Micro Center PowerSpec G479 outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Micro Center PowerSpec G479 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 149% better in F1 23 than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 296 vs 119 FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than Micro Center PowerSpec G479 - $730.82 vs $2899.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing F1 23 than Micro Center PowerSpec G479 - $6.14 vs $9.8 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
296
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.8/FPS
62.65306122448979%
Price, $
$2899.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6378 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
119
40.2027027027027%
Value, $/FPS
$6.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$730.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $730.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6391 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18.655462184873947%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11.426470588235293%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Core i5-12400F
null-core
Single-Core
2191
70.4954954954955%
Multi-Core
8910
42.34388366124893%
Micro Center PowerSpec G479 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 4 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD |
