Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms Memory on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 82% better in No Man's Sky than Memory - 200 vs 110 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Memory PC
232nd Variation
Megaport Gaming PC
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Memory PC
232nd Variation
Radeon RX 6700
10 GB GDDR6 | 160-bit
Pixel Fillrate
156.8 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
352.8 GTexel/s
43%
Megaport Gaming PC
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Megaport Gaming PC
35th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
100%
Multi-Core
13890
100%
CPU Winner
Memory PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | CPU | Core i9-12900F |
| Radeon RX 6700 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
