Key Differences
In short — Centaurus Proton 2 outperforms the cheaper IPASON - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing IPASON - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of IPASON - Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 90% cheaper than Centaurus Proton 2 - $459.0 vs $4696.95
- Up to 65% better value when playing World of Tanks than Centaurus Proton 2 - $2.78 vs $7.87 per FPS
Advantages of Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 262% better in World of Tanks than IPASON - - 597 vs 165 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
165
27.63819095477387%
Value, $/FPS
$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$459
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2463 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
597
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.87/FPS
35.324015247776366%
Price, $
$4696.95
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,696.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
35.9413754227734%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
21.627906976744185%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
null-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
IPASON - Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
