Key Differences
In short — CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR outperforms ERAZER on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value. The better performing CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR is 365 days older than ERAZER.
Advantages of CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC
- Performs up to 136% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than ERAZER - 52 vs 22 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
FPS
52
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
FPS Winner
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
47%
GPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2221
100%
Multi-Core
9125
100%
CPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2021 • 21st Variation
Core i7-10700K
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1724
78%
Multi-Core
8166
89%
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 25th, 2021 |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i7-10700K |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
