Key Differences
In short — ERAZER outperforms Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value. The better performing ERAZER is 416 days older than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4.
Advantages of ERAZER Desktop PC
- Performs up to 19% better in Death Stranding than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 - 107 vs 90 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Apr 17th, 2023
FPS
90
84%
Value, $/FPS
$7.40/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1023.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,023.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Feb 25th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Apr 17th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
Apr 17th, 2023
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
71%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2221
100%
Multi-Core
9125
100%
Apr 17th, 2023
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2221
100%
Multi-Core
9125
100%
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 17th, 2023 |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
