Key Differences
In short — Cobratype Python outperforms the cheaper acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Cobratype Python Gaming PC
- Performs up to 355% better in Valheim than acer Nitro 50 N50 - 232 vs 51 FPS
Advantages of acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 85% cheaper than Cobratype Python - $546.41 vs $3549.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Valheim than Cobratype Python - $10.71 vs $15.3 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
1st Variation
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.3/FPS
70%
Price, $
$3549.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
51
21%
Value, $/FPS
$10.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$546.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $546.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
1st Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-13900KF
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2973
100%
Multi-Core
20101
100%
CPU Winner
18th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
73%
Multi-Core
8910
44%
Cobratype Python Gaming PC | vs | acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
