Key Differences
In short — CLX Horus outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of CLX Horus Gaming PC
- Performs up to 174% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than MXZ - 170 vs 62 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 73% cheaper than CLX Horus - $849.0 vs $3169.99
- Up to 27% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than CLX Horus - $13.69 vs $18.65 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $3,169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for $849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
26%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
CLX Horus Gaming PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 6 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
