Key Differences
In short — CLX Horus outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of CLX Horus Gaming PC
- Performs up to 94% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than MXZ - 182 vs 94 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Desktop PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than CLX Horus - $939.0 vs $3749.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than CLX Horus - $9.99 vs $20.6 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $3,749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8733 minutes ago
Buy for $939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
CLX Horus Gaming PC | vs | MXZ Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 6 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
