Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Proton 2 outperforms the cheaper Lenovo LOQ Tower on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 64% better in No Man's Sky than Lenovo LOQ Tower - 217 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Lenovo LOQ Tower - $19.34 vs $19.69 per FPS
Advantages of Lenovo LOQ Tower Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 38% cheaper than Centaurus Proton 2 - $2599.0 vs $4196.95
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4196.95
61%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,196.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74098 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
132
60.82949308755761%
Value, $/FPS
$19.69/FPS
98.22244794311833%
Price, $
$2599
100%
Buy for $2,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19.233370913190527%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15.426356589147286%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
7th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
Centaurus Proton 2 Gaming Computer PC | vs | Lenovo LOQ Tower Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD |