Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Pollux 2 outperforms the cheaper HOENGAGER Panorama on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Centaurus Pollux 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 45% better in F1 23 than HOENGAGER Panorama - 186 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing F1 23 than HOENGAGER Panorama - $6.45 vs $7.58 per FPS
Advantages of HOENGAGER Panorama Gaming PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than Centaurus Pollux 2 - $969.99 vs $1198.98
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1198.98
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,198.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
128
68.81720430107528%
Value, $/FPS
$7.58/FPS
85.09234828496042%
Price, $
$969.99
100%
Buy for $969.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
69.51147733961153%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
69.51147733961153%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600G
3.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1918
70.12797074954295%
Multi-Core
7665
62.52549147565054%
Centaurus Pollux 2 Gaming Computer PC | vs | HOENGAGER Panorama Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
