Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — MXZ outperforms the more expensive Centaurus Polaris 4AW on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MXZ Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 48% better in F1 22 than Centaurus Polaris 4AW - 114 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Centaurus Polaris 4AW - $799.0 vs $976.55
- Up to 45% better value when playing F1 22 than Centaurus Polaris 4AW - $7.01 vs $12.68 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
77
67.54385964912281%
Value, $/FPS
$12.68/FPS
55.283911671924294%
Price, $
$976.55
81%
Buy for $976.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6547 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Arc A380
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
76.90504103165298%
Texel Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
65.92964824120602%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
85.86507572280863%
Multi-Core
7692
64.73112850290332%
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | vs | MXZ Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Arc A380 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
