Key Differences
In short — STGAubron outperforms Captiva® R69-364 High End | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | Nvidia GeForce® GTX 1650 4GB 4 | 16GB RAM DDR4 | SSD 1TB M.2 | AMD® A520 | mit Windows | Business on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of STGAubron Gaming PC
- Performs up to 50% better in Death Stranding than Captiva® R69-364 High End | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | Nvidia GeForce® GTX 1650 4GB 4 | 16GB RAM DDR4 | SSD 1TB M.2 | AMD® A520 | mit Windows | Business - 99 vs 66 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 337 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
42%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
105.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
224.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva® R69-364 High End Gaming | AMD Ryzen 5 5500 | Nvidia GeForce® GTX 1650 4GB 4 | 16GB RAM DDR4 | SSD 1TB M.2 | AMD® A520 | mit Windows | Business Desktop PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
