Key Differences
In short — Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms Captiva Advanced on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Captiva Advanced - 82 vs 62 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
50th Variation
FPS
82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1647.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,647.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
253.1 GTexel/s
73%
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
91%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
85%
Multi-Core
11527
67%
50th Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva Advanced Gaming PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
500 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |