Key Differences
In short — BEASTCOM Q7 Hero outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of BEASTCOM Q7 Hero Gaming PC
- Performs up to 244% better in Ready or Not than Acer Nitro 50 N50 - 306 vs 89 FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 84% cheaper than BEASTCOM Q7 Hero - $730.82 vs $4499.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Ready or Not than BEASTCOM Q7 Hero - $8.21 vs $14.7 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
306
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.7/FPS
55.850340136054434%
Price, $
$4499
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6708 minutes ago
10th Variation
FPS
89
29.08496732026144%
Value, $/FPS
$8.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$730.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $730.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
10th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12.013528748590756%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7.227906976744186%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Core i5-12400F
null-core
Single-Core
2191
70.4954954954955%
Multi-Core
8910
42.34388366124893%
BEASTCOM Q7 Hero Gaming PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 4 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD |