Key Differences
In short — BEASTCOM Q5 Pro outperforms the cheaper Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming PC
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU - 80 vs 71 FPS
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 19% cheaper than BEASTCOM Q5 Pro - $765.89 vs $949.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing No Man's Sky than BEASTCOM Q5 Pro - $10.79 vs $11.86 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
FPS
71
88%
Value, $/FPS
$10.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$765.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $765.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2022 |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Core i5-10400F |
| GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
![[Geforce RTX 3060] 2022 HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B09THKWSLK.jpg)
