Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Strix G16CH outperforms the cheaper Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 29% better in Minecraft than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 - 783 vs 608 FPS
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - $799.99 vs $1699.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Minecraft than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - $1.32 vs $2.17 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
FPS
783
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.17/FPS
60.82949308755761%
Price, $
$1699
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
Nov 13th, 2023
FPS
608
77.6500638569604%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
Nov 13th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Nov 13th, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74.5580808080808%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51.86649099692578%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-13700KF
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2887
100%
Multi-Core
17606
100%
CPU Winner
Nov 13th, 2023
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2290
79.32109456182889%
Multi-Core
10745
61.03033056912416%
ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2023 |
| Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
