Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG Strix G16CH outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 77% better in Starfield than Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 - 62 vs 35 FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 72% cheaper than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - $1059.49 vs $3739.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Starfield than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - $30.27 vs $60.31 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$60.31/FPS
50.19068147902503%
Price, $
$3739
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Jun 15th, 2024
FPS
35
56.451612903225815%
Value, $/FPS
$30.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1059.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,059.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
Jun 15th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jun 15th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
62.22339304531085%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
42.48201438848921%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
8th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Jun 15th, 2024
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
89.48726217349243%
Multi-Core
17332
82.53333333333333%
ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 N50-656-UR16 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jun 15th, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 20 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
