Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ASUS ROG Strix G16CH on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 34% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $3179.0 vs $4849.99
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 58% better in World of Tanks than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - 590 vs 373 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing World of Tanks than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - $8.22 vs $8.52 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
373
63%
Value, $/FPS
$8.52/FPS
96%
Price, $
$3179
100%
Buy for $3,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4426 minutes ago
FPS
590
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4849.99
65%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4419 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
43%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
GeForce RTX 3090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |