Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ASUS ROG Strix G16CH on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS ROG Strix G16CH is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 74% cheaper than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $1269.0 vs $4849.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $23.5 vs $35.4 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 154% better in Alan Wake 2 than ASUS ROG Strix G16CH - 137 vs 54 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
29th Variation
FPS
54
39.416058394160586%
Value, $/FPS
$23.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1269
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76841 minutes ago
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$35.4/FPS
66.38418079096046%
Price, $
$4849.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
29th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
29th Variation
Core i9-12900F
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2539
87.01165181631254%
Multi-Core
13890
70.74823002088321%
ASUS ROG Strix G16CH Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900F | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
