Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG G16CH outperforms the cheaper Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG G16CH Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 56% better in Monster Hunter: World than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 - 122 vs 78 FPS
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 46% cheaper than ASUS ROG G16CH - $749.99 vs $1389.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than ASUS ROG G16CH - $9.62 vs $11.39 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.39/FPS
84.46005267778752%
Price, $
$1389
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53352 minutes ago
Apr 17th, 2023
FPS
78
63.934426229508205%
Value, $/FPS
$9.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$749.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53367 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Apr 17th, 2023
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
48.14563928873836%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
60.20321761219305%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 17th, 2023
Core i5-12400F
null-core
Single-Core
2191
82.33746711762495%
Multi-Core
8910
57.576736672051695%
ASUS ROG G16CH Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Apr 17th, 2023 |
| Core i7-13700F | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
