Key Differences
In short — Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms the cheaper Centaurus Andromeda A4.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Centaurus Andromeda A4.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 26% better in Starfield than Centaurus Andromeda A4.1 - 58 vs 46 FPS
Advantages of Centaurus Andromeda A4.1 Desktop PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Alienware Aurora R16 - $1764.99 vs $3029.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Starfield than Alienware Aurora R16 - $38.37 vs $52.22 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
58th Variation
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$52.22/FPS
73%
Price, $
$3029
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 779 minutes ago
FPS
46
79%
Value, $/FPS
$38.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1764.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,764.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
58th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
78%
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
58th Variation
Core i9-14900K
null-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Centaurus Andromeda A4.1 Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
