Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ABS Cyclone Aqua outperforms the more expensive Alienware Aurora R16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Alienware Aurora R16 - 50 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Alienware Aurora R16 - $1483.99 vs $2809.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Alienware Aurora R16 - $29.68 vs $62.42 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
25th Variation
FPS
45
90%
Value, $/FPS
$62.42/FPS
47%
Price, $
$2809
52%
Buy for $2,809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
50
100%
Value, $/FPS
$29.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1483.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,483.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
25th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
25th Variation
Core i7-14700K
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2939
100%
Multi-Core
19317
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
90%
Multi-Core
15475
80%
Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | ABS Cyclone Aqua Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700K | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD + 8 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
