Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 2.0 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost 2.0 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 65% better in World of Warcraft than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - 235 vs 142 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC
- Up to 74% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $849.99 vs $3249.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $5.99 vs $13.83 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.83/FPS
43.311641359363705%
Price, $
$3249.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 232200 minutes ago
FPS
142
60.42553191489362%
Value, $/FPS
$5.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$849.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
34.03830806065443%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
28.88243831640058%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |