Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper AVGPC Whirlwind on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing AVGPC Whirlwind is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Warcraft than AVGPC Whirlwind - 228 vs 224 FPS
Advantages of AVGPC Whirlwind Gaming PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $1499.0 vs $3549.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $6.69 vs $15.57 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.57/FPS
42.96724470134875%
Price, $
$3549.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,549.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
FPS
224
98.24561403508771%
Value, $/FPS
$6.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1499
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | AVGPC Whirlwind Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 10 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
