Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper Panorama on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Panorama is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Dead Space than Panorama - 142 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Up to 29% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $2399.99 vs $3399.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dead Space than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $20.69 vs $23.94 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$23.94/FPS
86.42439431913115%
Price, $
$3399.99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2698 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
116
81.69014084507043%
Value, $/FPS
$20.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
69.32773109243698%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
67.94117647058823%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD |
