Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 60% better in Minecraft than MXZ - 916 vs 571 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 81% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $869.0 vs $4649.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Minecraft than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $1.52 vs $5.08 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
916
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.08/FPS
29%
Price, $
$4649.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,649.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15684 minutes ago
Buy for $869 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
