Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms the cheaper Alienware Aurora R9 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 159% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Alienware Aurora R9 - 225 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Alienware Aurora R9 - $20.89 vs $44.82 per FPS
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R9 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 17% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - $3899.0 vs $4699.99
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4699.99
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2734 minutes ago
FPS
87
38.666666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$44.82/FPS
46.60865684962071%
Price, $
$3899
100%
Buy for $3,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
116.2 GPixel/s
26.200676437429536%
Texel Fillrate
348.5 GTexel/s
27.015503875968992%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R9 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i7-9700K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 256 GB SSD |
