Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Panorama on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Panorama is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Panorama - 235 vs 228 FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $2499.99 vs $4699.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $10.96 vs $20.0 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$20/FPS
54%
Price, $
$4699.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Buy for $2,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
42%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD |
