Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MSI Aegis R2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Aegis R2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 45% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Aegis R2 - 222 vs 153 FPS
Advantages of MSI Aegis R2 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $2399.99 vs $4999.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $15.69 vs $22.52 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$22.52/FPS
69.67140319715807%
Price, $
$4999.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,999.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2706 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
153
68.91891891891892%
Value, $/FPS
$15.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2695 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
35.71589627959414%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35.30232558139535%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-14900F
null-core
Single-Core
3020
100%
Multi-Core
18270
90.6789755807028%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MSI Aegis R2 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 4 TB SSD |
