Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper CLX Horus on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing CLX Horus is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than CLX Horus - 222 vs 200 FPS
Advantages of CLX Horus Gaming PC
- Up to 28% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $3749.99 vs $5199.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $18.75 vs $23.42 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$23.42/FPS
80%
Price, $
$5199.99
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14067 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
200
90%
Value, $/FPS
$18.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$3749.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $3,749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
59%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | CLX Horus Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 6 TB HDD |
