Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460T R4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 426% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460T R4 - 163 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460T R4 - $30.37 vs $40.32 per FPS
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460T R4 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 75% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $1249.99 vs $4949.99
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$30.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4949.99
25%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $4,949.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Jan 1st, 2024
FPS
31
19%
Value, $/FPS
$40.32/FPS
75%
Price, $
$1249.99
100%
Buy for $1,249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Jan 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jan 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 1st, 2024
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2290
77%
Multi-Core
10745
53%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460T R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 6 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
