Key Differences
In short — Mavark 4K outperforms the cheaper Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Up to 46% cheaper than Mavark 4K - $4099.99 vs $7599.00
- Up to 39% better value when playing F1 22 than Mavark 4K - $16.14 vs $26.29 per FPS
Advantages of Mavark 4K Gaming PC
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - 289 vs 254 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
254
88%
Value, $/FPS
$16.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$4099.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $4,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
Buy for $7,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
63%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
59%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Mavark 4K Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 8 TB SSD |
