Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation outperforms the cheaper ALCPOK on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ALCPOK is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 95% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ALCPOK - 605 vs 311 FPS
Advantages of ALCPOK Gaming PC
- Up to 87% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation - $959.99 vs $7449.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation - $3.09 vs $12.31 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
605
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.31/FPS
25%
Price, $
$7449.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,449.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for $959.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ALCPOK Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
