Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Ghost 2.0 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Ghost 2.0 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 168% better in Ready or Not than ViprTech Ghost 2.0 - 306 vs 114 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC
- Up to 90% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation - $824.99 vs $7899.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing Ready or Not than Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation - $7.24 vs $25.82 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
306
100%
Value, $/FPS
$25.82/FPS
28%
Price, $
$7899.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $7,899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
Buy for $824.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 317 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Ghost 2.0 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 10 TB HDD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
