Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper MXZ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MXZ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 148% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than MXZ - 134 vs 54 FPS
Advantages of MXZ Gaming PC
- Up to 78% cheaper than ADAMANT CUSTOM 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $799.0 vs $3599.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than ADAMANT CUSTOM 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $14.8 vs $26.87 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$26.87/FPS
55.08001488649052%
Price, $
$3599.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77253 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
54
40.298507462686565%
Value, $/FPS
$14.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42.088382038488945%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.0177281680893%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
70.56360708534622%
Multi-Core
8910
40.809783355471076%
ADAMANT CUSTOM 24-Core Liquid Cooled Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | MXZ Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KS | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB HDD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
