Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Panorama on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Panorama is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Panorama - 415 vs 356 FPS
Advantages of Panorama Gaming PC
- Up to 31% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $2399.99 vs $3499.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $6.74 vs $8.43 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
415
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.43/FPS
79.95255041518388%
Price, $
$3499.99
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22461 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
356
85.78313253012048%
Value, $/FPS
$6.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
70.56307911617961%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
72.80367695338148%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
null-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Panorama Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD |