Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper Dell XPS 8960 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Dell XPS 8960 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 29% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Dell XPS 8960 - 537 vs 416 FPS
Advantages of Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $2650.31 vs $4499.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - $6.37 vs $8.38 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
537
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.38/FPS
76%
Price, $
$4499.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $4,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
27th Variation
FPS
416
77%
Value, $/FPS
$6.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2650.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $2,650.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
27th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
60%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
27th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
89%
Multi-Core
14759
73%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
